There is a supported interim path.
The existing platform and hardware can remain supported during evaluation, on terms within the available budget.
A worked example showing the assumptions, alternatives and conditions behind a phased platform recommendation.
For this exercise, assume the organisation needs to maintain service through a renewal deadline and wants to understand whether another platform would be a better long-term fit.
The existing platform and hardware can remain supported during evaluation, on terms within the available budget.
Its support status, behaviour and recovery on the candidate platform still need confirmation.
No immediate workload requirement justifies moving everything. Transfer costs and operating responsibilities remain unassessed.
Under the stated assumptions, retain the supported platform for an agreed evaluation period. Choose renewal terms that leave enough time to test, decide and—if justified—migrate before the next support deadline.
If current support cannot continue, renewal terms are unacceptable, or capacity is insufficient, the interim path must be redesigned. If the alternative passes the agreed checks and has a stronger operating case, plan a phased migration.
Sample records for this hypothetical platform decision, from the brief to the handover.
| Gate | Before recommending migration |
|---|---|
| Application | Confirm application support and pass the agreed functional checks. |
| Recovery | Restore the service on the candidate platform against agreed objectives. |
| Economics | Compare licences, transition, infrastructure and operating costs over the same period. |
| Ownership | Agree monitoring and support arrangements, required skills and a named service owner. |
Tell us what is changing and what needs to keep working.
Discuss your platform decisionBack to the connected view